Good? Evil? How can you know?
by Groff Schroederr
Probably most everyone sees him self as moral - seeking,
supporting and/or doing good. Perhaps a few want to do evil, but even
then probably only on a small scale and for personal gain. While super
villains who employ any means to their ends almost certainly exist,
even those who claim to lead others to good sometimes achieve great
evil. |
Some 2600 years ago, the Greek philosopher Pythagoras
founded "ethics," the study of morality. Philosphically,
we consider good as helping one or more people achieve benefit, such
as possessions, health, wealth, power, etc. Since individual benefit
often comes at others' loss, perhaps actions that provide immediate
real benefit to the many (versus actions promising future benefit
to only a few) might measure as more worthy of the label good. Similarly,
the number hurt might quantify evilness. |
In the achievement of good or the visitation of evil,
one can choose ethical methods such as reciprocity, negotiation, coalition
building and compromise, or unethical methods such as deception, misrepresentation,
fraud, assault and murder. Ethical methods are difficult, requiring
hard work and personal sacrifice, while unethical methods are quick,
easy, unexpected, effective, and when continuously managed, difficult
to detect, prove and prosecute. |
Some believe unethical tactics can achieve good, and
anyone can deceive themselves into believing they are achieving good
- even as they do evil things. For example, once elected, a politician
who systematically concealed a plan to establish "good"
but unpopular policies quietly but forcefully implements them. The
"good" policies become law (overruling the People) - thanks
to the "evil" of deception. |
Since many people choose to deceive over the minutia
of daily life ("little white lies" about the boss's hairstyle
etc.), and access to even small amounts of money and power can corrupt,
those pursuing morality must apply due diligence regarding possible
deception in situations involving great wealth and power.
|
How can you tell if someone is intentionally deceiving
you for personal gain, or have themselves been deceived by others?
These questions are especially cogent in time of war when, as history
and science shows, virtually anyone can commit appalling crimes simply
by "following orders." Access to information may make it
easier to recognize immorality, but opposing it is often extremely
difficult, especially when you have something to gain - or lose.
|
The words god and good and evil and devil share common
roots in many languages. If omnipotent good supernatural being(s)
exist, they rarely appear to intervene to achieve or reward good,
even when people commit horrific crimes or perform great works in
their name. In contrast, there is no need for supernatural evil because
unethical behavior appears irresistible to some, unethical approaches
are effective, and sadly, desperate people do desperate things.
|
If supernatural evil does exist, what greater victory
could it achieve than deceiving those seeking to do good into believing
that deception, fraud, murder or other unethical action somehow justifies
their efforts to do good. |
No matter what our beliefs, every day each of us makes
decisions with important moral ramifications, including accepting
ethical or unethical means. Eighteenth century poet Edmund Burke wrote,
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good [humans]
do nothing." If history is any indicator, there is much more
to moral decision-making than maximizing personal benefit or unquestioningly
doing what we are told. |
|
Send us an Email
Or write to us at:
Freethinkers of Colorado Springs
P.O. Box 62946
Colorado Springs, CO 80962-2946
Phone: 719-594-4506
|