Natural Selection - Fact or Fiction
  by Groff Schroeder

Some religious leaders oppose teaching the scientific principles of natural selection and evolution in the public schools.  Scientific principles (also known as laws) model physical realities such as conservation, gravitation, thermodynamics and countless others that appear to be inviolate properties of nature.  Unlike the hypothesis (an educated guess that can be tested by experiment), or the theory (a hypothesis demonstrated correct by countless competitive experiments over 100 years or so), a scientific law is a hypothesis observed to be true so many times over so many years that it is always assumed to be true.  Kind of like two plus two equals four.  Scientific laws are often associated with equations which provide the accurate, precise and predictive calculation that is critical to modern engineering, medicine and agriculture.  The knowledge and exploitation of scientific principles underlie all human technology from aerodynamics to zinc/nickel batteries – even artificial selection.

 

Through artificial selection, humans can select and preserve biological traits over generations.  Plant breeders can create high-yield crops through careful interbreeding of successful strains.  Animal breeders use similar techniques to obtain desired livestock traits.  Humans might even choose marriage partners based on the traits they would like to see in their children.  Because humans intervene in the life and reproduction of domesticated plants and animals over time, the organisms controlled by humans constantly change (evolve), eventually becoming adapted to the needs of those in control of the population.

 

No one denies that biology works this way in plant breeding or animal husbandry.  Virtually no one would reject the idea that for an animal to pass a trait to its offspring, the animal first has to have offspring.  Very few would deny that in order to have offspring, the animal must first survive.  Most would agree that these common sense ideas describe everyday biological reality.

 

In 1865, German monk Gregor Mendel employed artificial selection to elucidate the mathematical relationships that model the genetic traits in pea plants, publishing his findings in a paper called “Experiments in Plant Hybridization.”  Mendel’s experiments with artificial selection revealed how the dominant and recessive genes produced biological traits in repeatable, verifiable and predictable ratios.  These mathematical ratios are but a tiny fraction of the evidence supporting natural selection and evolution as principles of biology.

 

Natural selection occurs when an environment selects which animals survive to breed.  Organisms that have traits making them more likely to survive in their environment (such as minimal water needs in time of drought) survive longer and have more offspring that also are more likely to survive.  Organisms without the successful traits die or reproduce in lesser numbers.  Over many generations, organisms evolve, adapting to their environments. Genes that improve an individual’s chances of survival remain in the gene pool, while unsuccessful genes do not.  Evidence for natural selection and evolution appears in every area of biology.  Studies in prebiotic chemistry suggest that even the biomolecules of life probably evolved through natural selection in concert with their environments.

 

Despite the widely accessible, common sense realities of artificial selection in agriculture and animal husbandry, some continue to reject the scientific principle of natural selection even while they embrace virtually every other scientific principle in their use of engineering, telecommunications and medicine.

 

If natural selection is wrong, why does artificial selection work?

 

Send us an Email

Or write to us at:
Freethinkers of Colorado Springs
P.O. Box 62946
Colorado Springs, CO 80962-2946

Phone: 719-594-4506